๐บ๐ธ Trump’s Tariffs = A New Revenue Strategy? A PM’s Take on the Trade War
๐ข Trump’s Latest Tariffs – A Product Manager’s Perspective
In February 2025, President Trump imposed a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports, with no exceptions for allies. The goal? Boost domestic manufacturing by making imports more expensive.
Let’s analyze this like a Product Manager making a strategic business decision—using a payment gateway as our product analogy.
๐ฐ Revenue & Supply Strategy: Tariffs as a Feature Shift
This is like a payment gateway deciding to reduce reliance on third-party fraud detection tools by building an in-house risk management system.
Instead of paying external vendors (foreign suppliers) for fraud prevention, the company (the U.S.) is incentivizing internal development (domestic production)—even if it means short-term cost increases for merchants (businesses and consumers).
✅ Potential Wins (Short-Term Gains & Strategic Bets)
๐น Higher Revenue (Tariff Collections ๐ฐ)
๐ Analogy: This is like a payment gateway charging higher processing fees on transactions from external banks. It increases direct revenue, but merchants will bear the cost.
๐น Strengthened Domestic Supply Chain ๐ญ
๐ Analogy: Instead of using a third-party fraud detection API, the payment gateway builds its own fraud engine—gaining more control over risk and security.
๐น Job Creation for Local Industries ๐ท♂️
๐ Analogy: The company hires an in-house engineering team to develop fraud detection instead of outsourcing it—creating local jobs but also increasing fixed costs.
❌ Challenges & Risks (Unintended Consequences & User Pushback)
๐น Higher Costs for Businesses Using Imported Steel/Aluminum
๐ Analogy: Merchants now pay higher processing fees for transactions coming from external banks. Some will absorb it, others might switch to alternative payment providers.
๐น Price Hikes for Consumers (Cars, Appliances, Construction)
๐ Analogy: The payment gateway passes the cost of fraud prevention onto customers—higher fees per transaction, making small businesses and consumers pay more.
๐น Retaliation from Global Trade Partners (Counter-Tariffs on U.S. Exports)
๐ Analogy: External banks block or penalize transactions routed through this payment gateway, pushing merchants to competitors. This leads to a potential loss of market share.
๐ User Experience: Will Consumers (Citizens) Stay or Churn?
Every PM knows that monetization decisions impact user behavior.
๐จ Higher Costs: Merchants will see increased fees, just like manufacturers dealing with expensive raw materials.
๐จ Competitive Pressure: Some might switch to alternative payment gateways (foreign suppliers).
๐จ Market Shift: Larger merchants may negotiate better deals, while small businesses suffer the most.
๐ก PM’s Take:
This is like forcing users onto a new pricing model—some will adapt, but others may seek alternatives (offshoring, supply chain restructuring).
๐ Would You Ship This Strategy?
A good PM always asks: Is this move sustainable? Will short-term revenue outweigh long-term user churn?
Would you, as a PM, implement tariffs in your product strategy?
๐ฌ Share your thoughts in the comments!
#TheProductLens #ProductManagement #EconomicStrategy #Tariffs #PricingStrategy #TradePolicy #MarketDynamics #RevenueGrowth #ConsumerBehavior #SupplyChain #GlobalEconomy #Leadership #GrowthVsSustainability #BusinessStrategy #PMThinking ๐
Comments
Post a Comment